標題: [時事] I think everyone should know that the W case succeeds!!!!!
無頭像
ngohaijc
註冊會員
Rank: 1

帖子 13
註冊 2013-3-18
用戶註冊天數 4027
用戶失蹤天數 2194
狀態 離線
發表於 2013-5-13 12:32 
147.8.97.19
分享  私人訊息  頂部
http://hk.news.yahoo.com/終極裁決-變性人有權結婚-023915720.htmlcheck this out!!!!


無頭像
spolaw
註冊會員
Rank: 1

帖子 311
註冊 2012-7-13
用戶註冊天數 4276
用戶失蹤天數 3662
狀態 離線
發表於 2013-5-13 12:41 
202.140.78.205
I know and I'm glad to hear this


無頭像
ngohaijc
註冊會員
Rank: 1

帖子 13
註冊 2013-3-18
用戶註冊天數 4027
用戶失蹤天數 2194
狀態 離線
發表於 2013-5-13 12:45 
147.8.97.19
224.  Neither the appellant W, the respondent the Registrar of Marriages nor the intervener the International Commission of Jurists has addressed us on the question of same-sex marriage.  I proceed in this case on the footing that the right to marry guaranteed by our constitution is a right to marry a person of the opposite sex. Such a right is undoubtedly a human right.  To say that it has no application to post-operative transsexuals is to deny their humanity.  So it does apply to them.  In what way?  To say that what it guarantees is a right to marry in the pre-reassignment capacity would run counter to the purpose of sex reassignment surgery as a treatment for transsexualism.  It is inconceivable that a human right would operate in such an inhumane way.  What is left?  Quite simply and obviously, the right to marry in the reassigned capacity.


無頭像
ngohaijc
註冊會員
Rank: 1

帖子 13
註冊 2013-3-18
用戶註冊天數 4027
用戶失蹤天數 2194
狀態 離線
發表於 2013-5-13 12:45 
147.8.97.19
sighhh,, but i think it is one step forward: )))))))))

This case is like a miracleLOL!!


無頭像
kalaso
註冊會員
Rank: 1

帖子 328
註冊 2012-8-16
用戶註冊天數 4242
用戶失蹤天數 3875
狀態 離線
發表於 2013-5-14 09:08 
94.13.29.201
finally =)


 

此網站將關閉,請到 www.limehk.com